There is NO Natural Right to do filthy, irrational, degrading things to others in a “Justice” (virtue) System. Comparing behaviors to race is irrational and stupid. Like Epstein, Sandusky, Catholic “priests”, Franklin Cover-up—it is ALWAYS about grooming the little boys for thier lifestyle—like the boy toys of Barney Frank in his sex ring.

“When Law ceases to be Just (virtuous), it ceases to be Law” (Justice Marshall and Nuremberg Trials).
SCOTUS 5 need to be in prison for Treason and throwing out our Constitution and American Justice System for a pagan, satanic Stalinist system which ejects Reason and Virtue.

Taking a Justice System and removing “Virtue” from Just Law—destroys the US Constitution which is based on Right Reason according to Natural Law and Objective Truth. Sodomizing others is not only irrational and a vile, filthy way to use the human body—it is a Satanic practice (religion).

There is no “natural right” to the irrational, vile behaviors of sodomizing others or poking thinks into cavities for “lust”. It is forcing Satanism and Ba’al worship—-all the Rites of Ba’al Worship ejects Reason and uses sodomizing children in their orgies on their altars—also child-sacrifice (abortion/killing and blood drinking).

We created a “Justice (Virtue) System based on Western Civilization/Common Law (Christianity and Reason (Age of Reason)—not the irrational, vile paganism of Eastern mysticism, muslim boy-harem ethics or that of the Spartans/Samurai where sodomy is normal and sexism–hating and mutilatiing women is “normal”.

Without Reason—-we are like animals. Without emotions (desires) we are also dehumanized—that is why in Christianity we direct desire to the Good—and never suppress emotions. Righteous Anger is “good”. We need to carry the sword of Truth agains evil.

Common Core (publik “education”) reduces children to a “group think” —an emotionally only programming, so children will fear thinking “outside the box”—which is the only Rational type of “thinking”. Group Think is no thinking allowed—it is all emotional.

What she says under point four is this: “While some federal and state protections against discrimination are extended to some groups of people, the City of Houston has no local protections for any of the classes mentioned above. It’s still legal in the U.S. to fire someone from their job just because they are gay. A woman can lose her job because she’s pregnant, or a person can be denied service at a local establishment because of their skin color or religion.”

As I understand it, she’s saying federal law protects against discrimination on some grounds (e.g. race) but not others (e.g. sexual preference). She says that there are no local protections in place for any of the categories mentioned. It may not be graceful writing, but it isn’t factually incorrect.