What a terrible article. As other commenters have noted your comparisons with Muslim terrorists is highly flawed and has been disproved many times in the past.

The alt-right would never support Desai having come to America in the first place unlike you liberals.

Basically this article is just one long poorly written attempt on your part to justify your hatred of White people and the countries they have built.

Hmm, what happens to these numbers if you start counting on 09/10/01? Oops, your narrative collapsed!

Lol, the biggest mistake this article makes is that it doesn’t account for the fact that the United States was founded on white racial terrorism: From the genocide of the First Peoples to the chattel enslavement of people from various African nations. Even if you look at the beginning of the 20th century alone, massacres like what happened in Tulsa and Rosewood are far beyond the scale of most terrorist attacks today, and they’re but the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the crimes against humanity perpetrated by people who identify as white (cuz its not something rooted in anything biologically distinct, no matter what they say) in this country alone. They’re trying really hard to paint themselves as victims when they’re nothing but the impotent offspring of conquerors in centuries long decline.

Your time is coming nazi scum!

Top kek blaming the alt right for some dark skinned Indians shooting spree. No one knew this guy. He’s just another violent minority. Alt right strongly condemns violence.

You’ve got Dylann Roof. And if you actually looked at any thread on any of our sites you’d see a lot of condemnation. Of course, you’ll only post a screen cap of the random contrarian saying “Wooo dead googles! Yaaaaaah”.

When will BLM members decry violence? I know, I know - you can cherry pick examples of spokespeople being diplomatic. It’s what spokespeople do, after all. But how many “peaceful” riots in the last three years resulting in looting, burning, mob-violence - i.e. terrorism?

WLM had a protest yesterday. Evil Nazi white supremacists and how many dead? Total property damages? Did anyone loot Gander Mountain or burn down the Starbucks? No? And we’re the terrorists, right

I didn’t know Indians were so into white supremacy and the Alt-right. We should deport every Indian to prevent this horrible racism from spreading.

When is the left going to start confronting their violent members?

>the Alt Right is more than anything concerned with total Nihilism.
>*cites Salon*

lmao the Alt Right was borne from the nihilistic decay inflicted on society by Jewish Cultural Marxism, Jewish Critical Theory, and Jewish Cultural Relativism — all of which firmly cemented in the neo-Liberal power structure.

The Alt Right rejects the suicidal policies, cognitive dissonance, and self-hatred of Whites pushed onto them by narratives spun down by the (((Elites))) in media, government, and international finance.

The Alt Right reveres the family unit, homogeneous society, and a sense of duty to both. The world view which the Alt Right seeks to topple is the reigning poison which subjects Whites to exalted sexual deviancy, Third Worldism, and deracination.

Does that sound like Nihilism to you?

Desai was an indian. NOT a white nationalist.

Funny how you cite the numbers of “WHITE MALE TERRORISM” to be worse than islamic terrorism.

First off, even if you count all white males that did terrorism since 9/11 (convenient you leave out the worst atrocity in the United States history, isn’t it?), you STILL don’t get a number that’s even remotely close to what islamic terrorists have done.

The claim that white males somehow did more terrorism since 9/11 in the USA relied on counted robbing gas stations as ‘terrorism’ when white people did it.

Now, 140 people have been killed in islamic attacks, like San Bernadino/Orlando/Ford Hook/Boston Bombings since 9/11.
For ‘alt-right’ terrorists you can only really name Dylan Roof with 9.

Let’s compare those stats with population percentages.
There are 197m non-Hispanic whites in the US and there are 3 million muslims.

That means the average muslim is 92800% more likely to be a terrorist.
If you count 9/11, that number becomes 2024500%.

“Homegrown, right-wing and usually white male-centric terrorism is the most dangerous terrorism in America, far outweighing anything jihadist have done on American soil since 9/11”

—False. Mateen alone killed 50 people. Islamic attacks have already killed massively more people than “right-wing white males”, and if you compare them to proportion of the population (radical Muslim males - 0.05% of the population, right-wing white males - 10% or so), it’s ridiculous.

“This past week in Houston a lawyer named Nathan Desai suddenly opened
fire and shot six people before being killed by police. He was wearing
Nazi paraphernalia”

—Desai is INDIAN. A BROWN man. FAIL! Maybe the answer is no more Indian immigrants - would you think that makes sense because one Indian guy in a mid-life crisis, full of misanthropy, plays out a dark fantasy?

“When Hillary Clinton has to spend time explaining who Pepe the Frog is we have very much let the stupid, racist conspiracy-minded genie out of the bottle.”

—That was and remains her strategic ERROR. The Alt-Right remains a small corner of the internet with no mass organisation to speak of. Hillary just gave them free publicity and made an idiot of herself having some agrammatical screed written by a 20-something intern of the campaign on her website about how what was originally a Mexican pot-smoking frog, used by all sorts of people, is a neo-Nazi.

“It was groups like this that radicalized Dylann Roof into killing nine people in Charleston”

—I’m not sure what killing native Black people, whose families had probably been in North America for 300-400 years, in a Black church in Charleston has to do with illegal immigration, and you probably have no clue either. I will say that illegal immigrants KILL A LOT MORE THAN NINE PEOPLE EVERY YEAR, not that you care.

I don’t know who these “violent dissidents” you named are and neither does anyone else.

“More likely you don’t hear much outcry because the alt-right is more than anything concerned with total nihilism.”

—The alt-right is not monolithic - stretching from libertarians most concerned with cultural Marxism to neo-Nazi types at its extremes. That’s hard for people to understand but the reason for it is that it’s simply a revolt against the mainline GOP-insider official Conservatism, Inc. machine and the latter’s perceived corruption and cultural failures. But, yes, some of the alt-right people are most certainly nihilistic. That’s true (how else do you link libertarianism and extreme nationalism if not via Nietzsche?). Some of these people who live in video game land could certainly have a switch flip and go violent. The problem, however, is more that you have a class of people who can’t move out of their mothers’ basements whose whole lives are online and less the political ideology. What if instead of alt-right politics, they turned their nihilistic tendencies toward Black Metal or drug addiction - does that make them safer? Obviously not.

“is obsessed with creating a consequence-free zone where the most terrible ideas can be openly supported”

—I know the context of this comment is the nihilistic electronic world in which many alt-righters live. And you have a point. However, I isolated this bit because many would retort that the cultural Left that dominates university life to a large degree but also the petty social aspects of corporate culture to an increasing degree creates consequence-free zones for a priori anointed oppressed people (esp. gays and “transgendered”) in which bubbles are created and the most terrible ideas cannot be condemned - and this is in real life.

“It’s said that we now live in a post-fact world, but that’s not
accurate. The alt-right understands facts fine; they just don’t think
facts matter as much as winning an argument.”

—That’s trollish. One positive thing about the Alt-Right is that *since it has no no-go zones in terms of its debates and free speech*, it has a much clearer and more rational discourse than politically correct elements (incl. mainline Republican elected officials) who can barely tell you what they ate for breakfast without launching into some whitewashed bureaucratic code. And do we even need to go into the mental insanity of people dye their hair to look like an anime character and claim their identity to be a complex statement about their sexual and gender confusion? You’re confusing meme wars on 4chan boards with any actual political arguments coming out of the Alt-Right.

“It’s a frightening disconnect from reality”

—Like I said, the 4chan crowd lives in a virtual reality and the base problem for some of these people is the lack of social and job opportunities outdoors (for which you have to consider that if Trump were successful in his economic plans, maybe these overgrown kids would actually leave their parents’ homes. But you’re not being fair. The flip-side of the same issue is the army of surly, effeminate hipsters who might have slightly more of a social life but only within their own bubble. The true disconnect from reality, aside from people being more plugged in to the proverbial matrix, is that people cannot speak honestly at school and work - I’m afraid that your talk of “consequences” might even imply extending this tyrannical atmosphere to the internet. And that is mostly the cultural Left’s doing, even if they themselves are manipulated by the corporate masters some of them claim to oppose.

“which appeals well to the sort of folks who like to express their grievances with bullets”

—Actually, they are expressing their grievances in online fora, so they have an outlet. In terms of bullets, the main killer is the State, followed by radical Muslims, and then BLM.

“Unlike, say, American Muslims, who see upticks in hate crimes following Islamic terrorism, the alt-right is in no danger.”

—The GOP-leaning neoconservatives and Democrat-leaning neoliberals blamed 9-11 on Muslim extremists which is the source of American Islamophobia. The alt-right is a different group and their reactions are more justified since we’ve had several more verifiable attacks by actual American Muslim extremists. The Right has a problem that it fails to distinguish between strands of Islam or incorrectly claims that Wahhabism is “orthodox” and “traditional”. Of course, this is what the atheist Left does with Christianity - it takes the most insane dispensationalist Protestants and claim they represent the religion. Anyway, the Left has the problem that it increasingly defends Muslims as an oppressed group without any attention to these sectarian differences either.

The solution is - oppose Wahhabism/Salafism at all costs. Destroy terrorist groups. Defend Shi’a and mainline Sunnis, Sufis, and Ibadis. Defend Assad and secular Arab nationalism and the sovereignty of Middle Eastern countries … but not of Wahhabi and/or terrorist outlets (incl. CAIR, which is largely Saudi-funded). Wahhabism is being pushed by Gulf money which is politically allied with both the Americans and Israelis against the Russians and Iranians. The European Right, with which the alt-right sympathises, understands this better.